For independent news media organisations, journalists and journalism at large to function properly and survive economically, a number of conditions need to be met. These conditions can be grouped into three dimensions of the enabling environment for media and journalists. For many years these dimensions, in the analysis of Freedom House, consisted of the nationally-focused political, economic and legal enabling environment. But, increasingly, online communication platforms and technologies and innovations across borders as well as the online behaviour of audiences are impacting on the enabling environment for the media and the motivation and ability of states to regulate online.
This resource guide consists of three main sections. The first describes the three main pillars of the enabling environment for news media and journalists, with an emphasis on media viability and small and medium-sized media outlets. It will explore key concepts and issues of media law and regulation; main issues in the political environment that create or diminish space for media freedom and freedom of speech; and economic threats to and opportunities for media viability. A main theme throughout this section is how the enabling environment for the media has been dominated by tech giants, their influence on the platform economy and internet governance, and the struggle that existing regulatory and intellectual frameworks have to keep pace with this development.
The second section will look at the main multilateral and intergovernmental organisations as well as multi-stakeholder networks and platforms that serve as normative spaces and places for the enabling environment of the media. The third section will give an overview of advocacy strategies, toolkits and resources.
The resource guide does not attempt to include all possible considerations and developments within these sections. Instead, tries to strike a balance between general descriptions of the different phenomena and the responses of Free Press Unlimited and our partner network in our media development and advocacy work. It will make linkages to our combined track record and relevant evidence and literature that is being collected and expanded on a rolling basis in the evidence base.
Picture by ATMTX. Curves and Pillars, Russell Senate Office Building – Washington DC
Picture: Magna Carta
Picture by Ramyar Jabar
Picture by Romy van den Boogaart
Evidence base: Enabling environment for the media
|Local Radio Stations in Africa Prove Resilient Amid COVID-19||2020||Uganda, Zimbabwe||Center for International Media Assistance (CIMA)||Myers, M. et al.|
|Impact of the 2015 Universal Periodic Review on Press Freedom in Nepal||2020||Nepal||Free Press Unlimited||Thakur, M.|
|Safety of Journalists and the Fighting of Corruption in the EU||2020||Denmark, Europe, Hungary, Italy, Malta, Netherlands, Poland, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden||Institute for Information Law (IViR), University of Amsterdam||McGonagle, T. et al.|
|The Wisdom of the Crowd: Promoting Media Development through Deliberate Initiatives||2020||Ireland, Malawi, Mexico, United States of America||Center for International Media Assistance (CIMA)||Matasick, C.|
|Reporting Facts: Free From Fear or Favour||2020||Global||UNESCO||Dragomir, M.|
|State of Media and Digital Freedoms report in Pakistan, 2018||2019||Pakistan||Media Matters for Democracy||Rana, S. et al.|
|Developing Independent Media Associations in Ethiopia||2019||Ethiopia||Mersa Media Institute||Mersa Media Institute|
|Tackling Gender Inequality Through Access to Information||2019||Global||ARTICLE 19||ARTICLE 19|
|Digital Media Startup Companies in the Arab World||2019||Jordan, Lebanon, Morocco||Maharat Foundation||Maharat Foundation|
|The Safety of Women Journalists: Breaking the Cycle of Silence and Violence||2019||Afghanistan, Colombia, Indonesia, Iraq, Kenya, Nepal, Pakistan, Philippines, Somalia||International Media Support (IMS)||Chocarro, S.|
|Declaration Global Partner Meeting (Prague 2009)||2019||Global||Free Press Unlimited||Free Press Unlimited|
|State of Internet Freedom in Africa 2019. Mapping trends in government internet controls, 1999-2019||2019||Africa, Botswana, Burundi, Cameroon, Democratic Republic of Congo, Ethiopia, Kenya, Malawi, Nigeria, Rwanda, Tanzania, Uganda, Zimbabwe||Collaboration on International ICT Policy for East and Southern Africa (CIPESA)||Various authors|